Skip to content
fred.myarkibPRU
arkibPRUMalaysia Election Results Archive
Menu
Choose an analysis toolVotes vs Seats

GE-9 (1995)

Popular Vote vs Seats

How closely each coalition's seats match its popular vote — the Gallagher disproportionality index, the winner's bonus and the effective number of parties (ENP) over time.

Gallagher index6.89▼ 20.16 vs previous
Effective parties (votes)2.04▼ 0.49 vs previous
Effective parties (seats)1.92▲ 0.20 vs previous
Winner's bonus+7.4 ptsBN

How to read this

Vote % vs seat % (%) GE-9 (1995) · Sabah

Gallagher index Lower = more proportional

Effective number of parties (ENP) Laakso–Taagepera: 1 ÷ Σ(share²)

Votes & seats breakdown — GE-9 (1995)

Coalition Contested Votes % votes Won % seats Gap (pts) Vote % vs seat %
BN Profile 20 228,195 52.6% 12 60.0% +7.4
GR Profile 24 200,793 46.3% 8 40.0% -6.3
Independent / no coalition 10 3,878 0.9% 0 0.0% -0.9
APU Profile 1 825 0.2% 0 0.0% -0.2

Indices for each election

GEGallagher indexEffective parties (votes)Effective parties (seats)Winner's bonus
GE-15 (2022) 11.14 3.92 4.25 +8.4
GE-14 (2018) 5.70 3.26 3.11 +0.2
GE-13 (2013) 29.73 2.28 1.27 +33.3
GE-12 (2008) 32.26 2.06 1.08 +34.8
GE-11 (2004) 27.18 2.04 1.08 +31.1
GE-10 (1999) 23.52 2.07 1.34 +25.6
GE-9 (1995) 6.89 2.04 1.92 +7.4
GE-8 (1990) 27.05 2.53 1.72 +17.9
GE-7 (1986) 25.85 2.16 1.60 +27.6
GE-6 (1982) 9.73 1.99 1.88 +9.7
GE-5 (1978) 29.42 2.00 1.44 +29.4
GE-4 (1974) 39.15 1.91 1.00 +39.2
GE-3 (1969) 28.33 1.68 1.00 +28.3

Popular vote counts contested seats only; seats won unopposed count only as seats. "Independent / no coalition" includes non-aligned parties.